John: The Topless Prophet (part one)
‘KEEP YOUR HEAD ON.’
That’s what the pundits
started saying when John spoke against the sexual sin of the unrepentant one in power. ‘It’s contrary to God’s law for you to marry
your brother’s wife!’, the prophet firmly proclaimed.
His friends are probably
telling him to tone it down a bit. But John is an Elijah Man. In fact, he is
the uniquely prophesied Elijah Man talked about by Malachi 400 years earlier.
And his prophetic rebuke rings out over the swirling desert sands, disturbing
the comfort of everyone who had become laid back and tolerant over such
matters.
From our sophisticated, 21st
Century, Western perspective, we wonder if John couldn’t be just a bit nicer.
After all, it is being said that when our dear queen first heard John’s cruel
words, she went back to her castle to cry, indulge in chocolate ice cream, and
garner social media sympathy points. ‘That
John is such a hater!’ She tweets as she lambasts the preacher’s ‘toxic masculinity’.
The poor cupcake. She is,
after all, just a desperate castlewife. Preachers
aren’t supposed to say things that offend rich, powerful, and sexually immoral
women. Are they?
When hearing statements that
cut across our comfort levels, we should ask, Is this true? John’s rebuke
against Herod’s sexual sin is based on a law in Leviticus. It is stated in
chapters 18 and 20. And though Scripture directs us to usually give rebukes in
private, Herod was a public figure sinning publicly and unapologetically―therefore
a public rebuke was appropriate. It is the same today. (1 Tim 5.20)
Have you ever
worked with children? One of the things mine do, when I ask them about
something they’re uncomfortable with, is to pretend they don’t understand what
I’m saying.
Me: Did you clean
your room like I asked you to?
Child: Room?
Which room? Our house has lots of rooms.
Or
Me: Did you hit
your little brother?
Child: Brother?
Me: Yes, your
little brother. The one who is six.
Child: What do
you mean by ‘hit’?
We are big children and we do
this with the words of our Heavenly Father when he says things in Scripture
that we are not comfortable with. Here in the 21st Century
Anglo-Saxon world, we have become masters of this art. If John lived in our day
and issued his rebuke, the crowd around him would give him feedback along these
lines:
John: It is not
lawful for you to marry or sleep with your brother’s wife!
Us: John, are you
sure that’s relevant? There are far worse sins happening.
Us: Moses is no
longer the ruler of Israel John, we’re in Greco-Roman times now. We know things
the ancients didn’t.
Us: Sheep and the Goats John―at least
Herod feeds the poor. That’s what counts.
Us: Don’t judge
John. Focus on your own sin.
Us: But John, that
rule is taken from Leviticus―and that book has some weird stuff in it.
Us: John, you
should stick with your message about sharing our clothing with the needy. That
bit went down well in the media.
Us: But God is
love, and if Herod and Herodias really love each other, why would you want to
keep them apart?
Us: Moses wrote
that in Hebrew 1,500 years ago. We speak Aramaic. You need to understand the
word for ‘brother’ meant something different in the original dialect.
Clarity
When the
serpent got Eve to sin, he first fed her the idea that God’s Word was vague and
confusing. ‘Did God really say…?’ he
whispered. By contrast, God’s people are at their strongest when they reflect
on Scripture and say things like: ‘The
unfolding of your words gives light; it
gives understanding to the simple.’(Ps 119).
It is blasphemy to excuse our
laziness in the study of Scripture by blaming God for not being clear enough on
an issue.
Yes, there are some issues
that the Bible does not address and we are either ignorant or uncertain in
these matters. There are things we may wish the Bible did clearly address, but
it doesn’t. The Bible may direct you to care for your body, but it won’t tell
you exactly what diet or exercise program to embrace. It is wrong to assume it
speaks on things it does not―and thus add to the Word of God. But it is equally
wrong to take from Scripture by feigning an uncertainty that careful study will
show is unwarranted. Finding solid, relevant answers usually does not require formal theological education.
At best, the training involved in getting a theology or Bible degree may help
us explain why some of the new, creative, and contortionist interpretations―the
ones that get the passages to say something other than what they obviously
mean―are in error. Deception relies on confusion. But John takes his Bible like
we should take our whisky. Straight.
(See part two HERE.)
(See part two HERE.)
_______________
This is an extract from Elijah Men Eat Meat: Readings to slaughter your inner Ahab and pursue Revival and Reform
Comments
Post a Comment